Talk:Convoy OB 318

Military history: Maritime / British / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Action of 9 May 1941 was copied or moved into Convoy OB 318 with this edit on 27 August 2012. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Suggested merger

I suggest information from the article Action of 9 May 1941 should be merged into this article and replaced by a redirect to this article. The action on 9 May was a small (but significant) part of the defense of convoy OB 318.Thewellman (talk) 01:27, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merger completed.Thewellman (talk) 02:58, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OB318 and the Berhala

Berhala was loaded with railway engines for Turkey. This is well documented in the topic TCDD 45151 class where each locomotive delivered and lost is itemised. Why would the Berhala be in a convoy for North America, it was lost off Sierra Leone on its was around South Africa and up the Suez inline with its planned route but OB318 doesnt sound right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.152.211.112 (talk) 20:28, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]